Wernard Bruining (2003), How to avoid criminalisation of Euro Cannabis, learning from the Dutch Experience. A plea for depenalizing, yet controlling production of Cannabis for private use in Europe. Paper presented at the CEDRO Drug Policy Seminar, September 12, 2003, Amsterdam. Revised 10 October 2003..
© Copyright 2003 Wernard Bruining. All rights reserved.
How to avoid criminalisation of Euro Cannabis, learning from the Dutch Experience
A plea for depenalizing, yet controlling production of cannabis for private use in Europe
My reasoning about a realistic, pragmatic cannabis policy in the Netherlands and in Europe is based on:
1. The war against cannabis is lost
Cannabis is an accepted drug to our youth, and they represent the future. The number of cannabisconsumers has never been so high and has constantly risen in the past 70 years of prohibition. It is time to think about peace. Governments have to accept a reality of the multi-drug using society and adapt to it.
2. Somewhere in future cannabis will be legal
History has seen a range of social prohibitive law’s, none of them lasted longer than a 100 years. Europe’s youth has accepted cannabis as a rather innocent drug and does not understand why governments maintain prohibition. Prohibition reduces the credibility of governments, and authorities in the eyes of the Europeans of tomorrow.
3. If the war on cannabis is lost, and production and consumption will be legal in future, we live now in an intermediate period
The challenge Europe faces is to get through this intermediate period with at least damage for our society as possible.
So we have three assumptions.
The cannabis avalanche
From the beginning of the nineties, an explosive growth of homegrown cannabis took place in the Netherlands. In less than a decade more than 80% of Dutch consumption of cannabis was produced in the Netherlands itself.
In an attempt to visualize the speed of this event Mr. Adriaan Jansen, Phd of the Amsterdam University, came up with the metaphor of The Green Avalanche. Social changes are comparable to avalanches. You can’t stop them, only try to prevent societies to be completely overflown and destroyed.
You can’t fight avalanches by just planting as many trees as possible in defence, you have to remove trees on other spots, offering the avalanche an attractive alternative route. A smart technique is to deliberately create manmade, relatively small, and therefore controllable avalanches, to avoid build up of snow and pressure.
We live in the intermediate time that ends with legalisation, at the moment Europe faces a green avalanche. If Europe is smart, it will maintain certain restrictive laws, but allow enough small-scale production and consumption to avoid a build up of pressure in the cannabis market and at the same time control the avalanche.
Dutch growshop wholesalers export an estimated 100 million euro per year. European growers multiply each euro invested many times a year. If we multiply the Dutch export of 100 million euro with a factor 5-10 we get an idea how big eurocannabis is at the moment, about 500 to a billion euro. Export of Dutch wholesalers is growing about 20-30% per year.
New improved techniques enable cannabis cultivation on a very small scale such as cannabis closets. These small scale techniques enable almost everybody to grow and are hard to detect. And all of these growers and smokers ignore the law. This is the probably the biggest negative effect of prohibition, it creates citizens that learn to disobey the law. European governments structurally do not respect a considerable, expanding group of citizens, who in return do not respect the government and their laws.
Prohibition is probably one of the key elements at the base of the constant decline of moral standards of citizens and governments. In the Netherlands a policeman cannot patrol the streets alone anymore, and in England, Bobbies have to bear arms. A policeman is not considered a citizens best friend anymore.
Criminalisation of Dutch cannabis
The Netherlands has a long history of tolerance towards the growing of cannabis since 1970. Ten thousands of Dutchmen were growing cannabis in their gardens and on their balcony’s. It was regarded as an innocent hobby and it supplied a lot of people who did not have to go to and spent money on illegal import from third world countries.
In 1980 the first Sinsemilla (seedless marihuana) of commercial quality came on the market and found its way to the Dutch consumers. Gradually, Dutch home-grown diminished illegal import from third world countries.
In 1985, the first indoor grown (Skunk) was introduced, and the consumers loved it. That same year the first growshop opened in Amsterdam, selling lights, fertilisers, cannabis cuttingss or clones, and seeds. Indoor grown, in greenhouses and under lights took a important part of the market and constantly lowered the kilo price. In 1995, 80% of Dutch cannabis consumption was homegrown, making it the best medicine against illegal import.
But publicity stimulated more and more people to get involved in producing cannabis. Earning money, instead of grwoing your own smoke became a dominant drive. The quality produced by these “moneygrowers” was mediocre, but for the rest of Europe their product was good enough. Gradually more and more cannabis produced in the Netherlands was just grown for export.
In 1997, new stricter laws towards growing were applied. Growing more than a 100 plants was now regarded as a crime with the possibility of serious fines or even jailtime. Electricity companies started to report bigger than usual customers to the police, thus stimulating the theft of electricity. Most hobbyist growers slowed down or even stopped. Outdoor cannabis almost disappeared from the market and the price of indoor grown rose to an attractive high level stimulating professional illegal growers even more.
Today a major part of Dutch cannabis production is produced by non-smokers, just for export. The Dutch cannabis policy actually created the situation it feared.
Europe should learn from this Dutch experience and try to avoid criminalisation of EuroCannabis.
How to avoid criminalisation of EuroCannabis
We can visualise criminalisation of EuroCannabis as a sound panel with movable slides. Criminalisation of cannabis is influenced with at least three slides: the kilo price, the tools and the law.
If the kilo price is high, tools to grow are accessible, the law is strict, and conditions are optimal for criminalisation. This is the case in most European countries today, al three slides are up!
Governments cannot easily directly manipulate the first two slides, price and tools. But the third slide, the law concerning growing cannabis for private use can easily be changed to more or less strict.
The law concerning cannabis cultivation is controlled on a panel with at least four slides:
The easiest and most effective tool governments have to manipulate kilo price of EuroCannabis is production and fines.
If growing of just one plant were allowed, prices would remain very high. If growing of 100 plants would be allowed, production would be huge and prices would soon drop to a minimum. marihuana would overflow our society and it is a bit to early for that. The global political situation will not tolerate the end of prohibition right now.
My first recommendation is to allow ten plants for private use to achieve a comfortably low price and have marihuana accessible for those who really seek its comfort. Most cannabis seed packs contain ten seeds, so it is a logical and practical rule. Growing of more than ten plants should remain prohibited. This enables police oppression of large scale growing to be more effective, and it is sensible regarding present international circumstances.
Decriminalisation of growing ten plants lowers THC level
One of the first effects of decriminalisation of growing ten plants will be that people start to grow outdoors. Outdoor growing technique is cheap, easy and environmental friendly. Outdoor cannabis reduces the need to grow indoors under lights, reducing the use and stealing of environmental unfriendly electricity. Outdoor grown cannabis has a lower percentage of THC and a lower price.
So, if outdoor grown cannabis is available in sufficient amounts it has a lowering tendency on THC levels. It is easier to grow volume with a low percentage of THC, than to invest time, money and effort in production of expensive and high quality cannabis with a high THC level. High repression level stimulates production of cannabis with a high THC level. A low level of repression has the opposite effect.
High level of THC is a relative factor, strong, expensive cannabis does not mean that more THC is consumed; it just means that smokers can afford to put less of the expensive cannabis in a joint to obtain the desired effect.
Experienced smokers do not consume more THC than to reach a certain level of high. Today nobody in the Netherlands tries to smoke as much as possible and get wasted, as was the style in the old Hippie days. The consumer’s sub-culture has changed. Today people just want a nice buzz, some relaxation, and keep on swinging.
Last but not least, the availability of low priced cannabis reduces illegal import. It does not make sense or is economical viable to produce and export expensive high quality cannabis to a country that has enough low priced product.
Decriminalisation of growing ten plants for private use lowers the price, diminishes criminal involvement, reduces the THC level, and reduces illegal import.
If growing of ten plants is decriminalised it still leaves growshops vulnerable to temptation of getting involved with large-scale growers. A system of tolerating ten plants should therefor preferably be combined as a finishing tough with practical ruling towards sales of ten plants/clones per customer by growshops.
The challenge is to create a system that enables growshops to sell plants/clones, yet to keep them controlled, ánd make them partners in maintaining the system.
How to control growshops and the sales of clones
My second recommendation is to issue permits to growshops to produce and sell clones. This gives growshops a serious income of hundreds to a thousand plants/clones per week at a selling price of 2-3 euros. It makes growshops controllable and partners in maintaining the system of small scale growing. An independent “cannabis committee” under a few strict rules can issue the permit:
Growshops that make a lot of money selling clones, can and will reject business with large-scale growers or loose their permit.
Shops that do not have a permit obviously sell to large-scale growers and can easily be dealt with by means of some extra police attention. It is easy to register license plates of cars visiting unwanted growshops, check and scare away customers. Within weeks such a growshop would be out of business.
This recommended system could get us through the intermediate time, until complete and inevitable legalisation, without risking criminalisation of EuroCannabis, and upsetting the international community.
Wernard Bruining opened Mellow Yellow, the world's first coffeeshop, in 1973 in Amsterdam. In 1980 he and a few friends formed the "Green Team" introducing seedles Sinsemilla growing in the Netherlands. In 1985 Wernard started Positronics, the first "growshop" in Europe, selling lights, seeds, clones and fertilizers. He introduced the word "Mediwiet" in 1994 and a system to supply patients via coffeeshops. Since 1998 he professionally visits hundreds of coffeeshops, growshops and smartshops in the Netherlands, publishing his favorites, in cards and books for tourists.)
Last update: May 25, 2016